You Are Here: Home » Feature Articles » Articles & Reportage » Box Hill Road Race – Why Us Cyclists Should be Ashamed

Box Hill Road Race – Why Us Cyclists Should be Ashamed

box hill Millions of people are expected to line the route of the Olympic road cycling race on Saturday.  It will be a national celebration of a sport that has suddenly captured the public’s imagination.  It will be confirmation that cycling – and cyclists – are finally major players on the world sporting stage.

Except it won’t be any of those things, not really.

In fact one part of the route will be an illustration of just how far Britain still has to go before cyclists are truly taken seriously.

The 15,000 spectators on Box Hill, where Bradley Wiggins, Mark Cavendish, Chris Froome, David Millar and Ian Stannard of Team GB will be aiming to complete nine grueling circuits ahead of the peloton, have had to pay £15 for the pleasure.

That’s £15(£5 for kids) to access what, at any other time of the year, is effectively free, public space.

Can you imagine that happening on the Tour de France?  Can you imagine what would happen if the French government suddenly announced it would be charging fans who wanted to greet the peloton as it crested the Tourmalet or Aubisque?

There would be more than just tacks in the road.

How did it get to this?  How did we allow the Olympic organizers to charge £15 a head – not an inconsiderable amount of money for an event supposedly embracing Corinthian values being held in the middle of a recession – for spectators to stand on the side of a public road to watch a sport that, anywhere else in the world, is considered a free spectacle?

The justification trotted out by LOCOG(London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games) is that the money raised will recoup the costs of a “detailed wildlife survey” carried out on the area to determine the viability of allowing access to spectators.

The survey, incidentally, reached the conclusion that “increasing space for spectators will not cause any harm to the area.”

Did it really cost in the region of £200,000 to establish that?

Part of Box Hill – including the famous 1.6 mile climb up Zig Zag Road – is owned and managed by the National Trust, hence the need for the survey.  But just because it’s home to a few species of dormouse and wood-eating insects, does that really justify charging spectators?

Are we supposed to believe that high on the slopes of the Tourmalet, which has been crossed 77 times in the history of the Tour de France, all wildlife has been wiped out by those hordes of flag-waving, wig-wearing, beer-swilling cycling fans?  The Tourmalet is part of a national park network which proudly bills itself as “The Kingdom of Untamed Nature”.  And they’ve never had to charge a spectator in their history.

It won’t surprise you to learn that the National Trust won’t be getting a penny of the ticket money.  All of it goes to LOCOG.  That’s the same LOCOG who have threatened to sue any shopkeeper who puts any Olympic symbols or slogans in their windows.  The same LOCOG who, according to The Times this week, has banned the village newsletter, the Box Hill News, from being sold along the road race route because it is not an official sponsor.

To me, this whole episode just serves to show that when it comes to standing up for our rights, the Brits in general – and, I’m sorry to say, cyclists in particular – are a bunch of spineless wimps.

Yes, there were a few murmurings of dissent on cycling internet forums when the idea of charging spectators was first mooted, but that’s about as indignant as we got. All those roadies, mountainbikers, fixies, commuters, MAMILs and weekend warriors just couldn’t form any kind of collective, sustainable protest movement.  We just rolled over and died.

The simple fact is, this should never have been allowed to happen.

When they start charging for places along the route of the Tour of Britain, we’ve only got ourselves to blame.

Picture via buhsnarf

  1. Learning Early – Authorised Strider Bike Dealer:

    Its wrong. We should be out to celebrate their success in the #TDF and show some support for them in the Olympics. Maybe they are scared of the sheer numbers that will turn up – unlike the football..

  2. Phil Graham:

    Absolutely spot-on. It's a disgrace and goes entirely against the spirit of road racing.

    1. Stu Bradley:

      Hardly surprising at all. Money-grabbing spivs. :(

    2. Judie Thomson:

      Drove down the route this morning on the way to our granddaughter – what a nerve!!

    3. Naurika Cahill:

      Unbelievable. "They" get away with murder.

  3. Le Chant d'Oiseau:

    How terribly sad, and what a reflection on the UK? The eyes of the world are firmly focussed on London right now, and what kind of a signal does this send out to not only those interested in the Olympics, but to tourists in general? That the UK is grabbing the cash and cycling off into the sunset. Bad form, LOCOG, bad form.

    1. John Hodgkins:

      Sadly, I suspect LOCOG is simply following the IOC line. Sounds so much like the actions of VANOC at the 2010 winter games in Vancouver. The Olympics have been taken over by the lawyers.

  4. Terry Little:

    Should say its for repair to ground and picking up litter left be kind hearted people. plus the cost of police for the event.

    1. Trevor Ward:

      The Tour de France, Giro, Vuelta, etc, all use the services of the police and litter collectors. But spectators aren't charged to watch those events.

    2. Terry Little:

      But France is different in lots of ways,the Police are STATE Police.Plus the Tax System is different. No good trying to work in France it is to high on the IMPO side.But if Retraite GREAT.

  5. John Armstrong:

    The Olympic ideal is now wrapped in a wreath of notes.

  6. Antony Auty:

    Quote from Jason Intrepid Apparel – '‘Just been over to Olympic Expo event at Boxhill ( TOTAL-SHAMBLES) and the chaos has already ensued as with the extra traffic a cyclist has be knock off there bike. Hope the unfortunate casualty is ok.’.

  7. Paul 'Novo' Nowaczek:

    They can kiss my a**, to be charged for standing on the side of a public road that we, the taxpayer pays for, and support our country in the olympics is an absolute disgrace! Bloody money grabbing gits.

  8. Craig Bickerton:

    hmmm so by this argument, runners should get in to see the athletics for free, swimmers shouldn't pay to see Phelps, Addlington etc… it's the Olympics so why should cyclists assume they are the only ones with the right to watch for free just because this event is over too long a distance to be held in a stadium. Would you all be moaning as much to watch the exact same sportsmen in a velodrome?

    1. Martyn Williams:

      I ran for the bus once, any chance of a 100m final ticket?

    2. Craig Bickerton:

      sorry but I've seen you ya lazy layabout and find it very hard to believe you ever ran anywhere lol

    3. Phil Graham:

      Nope, that's not the argument. The argument is that at previous Olympics (including Beijing) tickets were not required for large areas of the road and time trial course …

  9. Lizzie O'Connor:

    the charge was to make sure they limited the amount of spectators on the Hill because it is a SSSI. As an ecologist and a cycling fan I didn't have a problem with this, I just made sure I saw the 9 laps from Old London Road instead. If the TDF went over a SSSI then the same would happen there, so that just shows how little you know about it. Its about MORE than cycling.

    1. Phil McCutchion:

      Should always be free first come first served ala Tdf,,

About The Author

Editor

Trevor Ward is an ex-professional cyclist (postman) who cycled to the Sahara Desert and back in the days when the locals lined up to throw stones at you instead of ask for your email address. He's on Twitter @willwrite4cake

Number of Entries : 43

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

© 2013 bikesoup.co.uk

Scroll to top